Abstract

AbstractThis study selected the temperature Penman–Monteith (PMT) model to solve the difficulty of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) prediction caused by incomplete meteorological data. Then, the principal control factor of the PMT model was determined using several indicators. The results show that the annual average correlation and sensitivity coefficients between Tmax and ET0 are the highest. Hence, among the factors, Tmax is the largest contributor in contribution proportion and amount to ET0 and the principal control factor of the PMT model. The root mean square error (RMSE), relative error (RE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the forecast ET0 increased by 0.7, 0.2, and 0.6 mm/day, respectively, after the 16th day compared with those on the 15th day. Thus, a remarkable drop in ET0 forecast precision is observed and is hardly accurate for the purpose of water distribution management in an irrigation district. The RMSE, RE, and MAE of the Tmax forecast decrease by 2.0–3.0°C, 0.1–0.2, and 2.0–2.8°C, respectively, and those of the corresponding ET0 forecast decrease by 0.7–0.9, 0.2–0.3, and 0.6–0.7 mm/day, respectively, after Tmax correction. Compared with the decaying‐average method, the improved decaying‐average method can correct Tmax better and improve the ET0 prediction accuracy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.