Abstract
The potential for reviewer bias exists whenever a research paper is sent to referees for peer review prior to publication. For most journals, including Medical Physics, the authors are "blinded" to the identities of the referees, and it has been suggested that one way to reduce the risk of bias is to "blind" referees to the identities of authors and their in stitutions. The proposition that such "double-blind" review be adopted for articles submitted to Medical Physics is the topic debated in this month's Point/Counterpoint.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
