Abstract

The aim of this work was to develop a better understanding of a floating medium in a mechanical filtration mode. The experiments were carried out using a commonly available polystyrene floating medium filter with the grain size of 1 mm. A sand medium filter with the similar grain size was also tested for the comparison. A short-term trial of 2 h and a long-term of 20 days filtration times were conducted with three custom manufactured pressurized filters of 16 l. The filters were operated under three different configurations: (i) upflow with floating media (UFMF), (ii) downflow with floating media (DFMF) and (iii) downflow with a sand medium (DSF). The results of the long-term trial indicated that at a flow rate of 22 m/h, the UFMF and DSF had similar solid removal capacity with an average total suspended solids (TSS) removal efficiency of 60%. The DFMF could only remove 33% of TSS. However, during the short-term trial, TSS removal efficiency of the UFMF was better compared to the DSF (e.g., 71%, 56% and 57% of TSS removal in UFMF compared to 66%, 49% and 41% in the DSFF at the flow rates of 20, 25 and 31 m/h, respectively). The energy requirements of each filter were compared by measuring the pressure differential across each filter. The long-term trial indicated that the UFMF had a significantly less pressure differential (44 kPa) compared to the DSF (80 kPa) ( p < 0.001). This was further confirmed that at different flow rates whereby the DSF displayed higher pressure differentials for filtration rates at 350, 450, 550 and 800 l/h. The study indicated that floating medium filter was better and more applicable to recirculating aquaculture systems than conventional pressurized sand filter.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call