Abstract

The thickness, reinforcement, and concrete strength grade of railway caps in China are generally determined according to the force, yet the method for calculating the force is unclear. To date, there is no desirable calculation method for analyzing the caps. Based on the fifteen‐pile thick cap of mixed passenger and freight railway, the influencing factors on cap bearing capacity were analyzed using finite element method (FEM). The variations of load‐bearing capacity and mechanical behavior of thick cap were characterized by introducing rigid angle α. Results indicated that ultimate load‐bearing value of the cap increased linearly with the increase of concrete strength grade, and an increasing load‐bearing capacity of the reinforcement distributed in the pile diameter range was larger than that of the uniform reinforcement; when the reinforcement ratio was 0.15%, it increased by 9.3%. The cap showed punching failure when α < 45°. The reaction force at each pile top under vertical load was not equal; thereby, the cap was not absolutely rigid. The principal compressive stress trajectories in the concrete were distributed in the range of connecting the pile and the outer edge of the pier, and the effective tensile stresses in the reinforcement were mainly distributed in the diameter range of pile and pile connection, which is in accord with the stress mode of the ordinary spatial truss model. Based on this, a spatial truss model applicable to the design of railway caps is proposed, and a method for calculating reaction force at pile top and formulas for calculating the bearing capacity of strut and tie were presented. The feasibility of the proposed method was also verified by comparison with FEM results.

Highlights

  • Academic Editor: Xueping Fan e thickness, reinforcement, and concrete strength grade of railway caps in China are generally determined according to the force, yet the method for calculating the force is unclear

  • Mechanical characteristics of railway bridge caps are different from those of few pile caps in building structure. e thickness, reinforcement, and concrete strength grade of railway caps in China are generally determined according to the force; the pile cap is usually designed by controlling the rigid angle and setting steel bars mesh at the bottom [20]

  • By taking into account factors such as concrete strength grade, pile spacing, cap thickness, reinforcement ratio, reinforcement distributed form, load form, and their variations, this paper analyzed the influence of each factor on bearing capacity, failure mechanism inside the cap, stress trajectories in the concrete, stresses distribution in the reinforcement, and law of the reaction force at pile top. is study was seeking to determine whether strut-and-tie model (STM) method is suitable for the calculation of railway cap and proposed the calculation method of cap bearing capacity

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Received 19 July 2020; Revised 13 August 2020; Accepted 21 August 2020; Published 18 September 2020. A spatial truss model applicable to the design of railway caps is proposed, and a method for calculating reaction force at pile top and formulas for calculating the bearing capacity of strut and tie were presented. Bloodworth et al [4] studied the effects of shear span, cap width, and reinforcement ratio on the shear behavior of the cap under full-width wall loading, observed strut-and-tie model (STM), and thereby proposed an improved modified strut-and-tie method which gives more accurate predictions for the analysis of a four-pile cap. Abdul-Razzaq and Farhood [9] designed and manufactured 12 RC cap specimens with different number of piles, comparatively studied the difference of bearing capacity and failure mechanism of the specimens designed according to the traditional section design method and the STM, and pointed out the shortcomings of cap design in ACI

Advances in Civil Engineering
Pier height h
Parameter variation
Concentrated reinforcement
Principal tensile stresses region
Bottom nodes
Calculation model
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.