Abstract
Three horses were butchered and their economic anatomy examined. A Meat Utility Index (MUI) and a Marrow Index (MI) were derived, and these were modified to produce a Food Utility Index (FUI) using the methodology of Binford (1978) and Metcalfe & Jones (1988). The indices were compared with those for caribou, and the economic anatomy of the two species shown to be quite dissimilar. In horse there is a much greater concentration of meat on the cervical vertebrae, the thorax and the pelvis, while the limbs below the humerus and femur are of very little value. Although large, horses have relatively little marrow, due to more trabecular bone and thicker bone walls reducing cavity volume; marrow utility in the different elements varied between the three horses, but femur always yielded most. These results will be of use to those studying skeletal element frequency at European palaeolithic and other archaeological sites.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
