Abstract

Despite widespread anecdotal evidence that lower trade barriers increase international trade, there is little firm quantitative evidence of the ‘trade-cost elasticity’ of trade flows, one of the two key aggregate statistics that have recently been identified as sufficient to quantify the economic welfare effects of trade-policy liberalizations and/or trade-cost reductions (the other statistic being the import-penetration ratio). In other words, most estimates of the trade-cost elasticity are imprecise and lack consistency. In this article, we discuss two issues that are critical in better assessing empirically the trade-flow and welfare effects of trade liberalizations (or trade-cost changes). The first issue is how to quantify the trade-cost elasticity when trade costs themselves are approximated imperfectly. The second issue is that typical empirical evaluations to estimate the impact of trade-policy liberalizations on trade flows use the ‘gravity equation’. However, the selfselection of country pairs into such agreements introduces endogeneity bias in the estimation of the trade-cost elasticity in gravity equations, requiring better identification techniques.(JEL codes: F10; F12 and F13)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.