Abstract
Human capital—that is, resources associated with the knowledge and skills of individuals—is a critical component of economic development1,2. Learning metrics that are comparable for countries globally are necessary to understand and track the formation of human capital. The increasing use of international achievement tests is an important step in this direction3. However, such tests are administered primarily in developed countries4, limiting our ability to analyse learning patterns in developing countries that may have the most to gain from the formation of human capital. Here we bridge this gap by constructing a globally comparable database of 164 countries from 2000 to 2017. The data represent 98% of the global population and developing economies comprise two-thirds of the included countries. Using this dataset, we show that global progress in learning—a priority Sustainable Development Goal—has been limited, despite increasing enrolment in primary and secondary education. Using an accounting exercise that includes a direct measure of schooling quality, we estimate that the role of human capital in explaining income differences across countries ranges from a fifth to half; this result has an intermediate position in the wide range of estimates provided in earlier papers in the literature5–13. Moreover, we show that average estimates mask considerable heterogeneity associated with income grouping across countries and regions. This heterogeneity highlights the importance of including countries at various stages of economic development when analysing the role of human capital in economic development. Finally, we show that our database provides a measure of human capital that is more closely associated with economic growth than current measures that are included in the Penn world tables version 9.014 and the human development index of the United Nations15.
Highlights
Using schooling as a proxy for human capital assumes that being in school translates to learning
In rural India, half of the students in grade 3 cannot solve a two-digit subtraction problem[1]. These data from previous studies demonstrate a substantial gap in the formation of human capital: students are in school, but do not learn enough
Several studies have suggested that when human capital is measured by schooling, it does not deliver the returns predicted by growth models
Summary
Using schooling as a proxy for human capital assumes that being in school translates to learning. In rural India, half of the students in grade 3 cannot solve a two-digit subtraction problem (such as 46 – 17)[1] These data from previous studies demonstrate a substantial gap in the formation of human capital: students are in school, but do not learn enough. Closing this gap is an important priority for economic development. Existing measures exclude a considerable portion of the global distribution, in particular countries with the most potential to gain from the accumulation of human capital. In this Article we bridge this gap. A large-scale effort to track the formation of human capital using this database is the World Bank’s new human capital index[25]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.