Abstract
Abstract India’s insolvency framework mandates preserving viable firms as going concerns, but a critical gap remains – the lack of a standardised approach to assessing a firm’s viability during bankruptcy proceedings, resulting in inefficient allocation of interim finance to insolvent firms. This study sheds light on this issue by examining the performance of 21 firms during insolvency. We find that the absence of a clear viability assessment has led to suboptimal outcomes: viable firms being underfinanced and unviable firms being overfinanced. This has led to value deterioration, as many viable firms were ultimately pushed into liquidation due to insufficient interim financing. As a remedy, the authors propose a periodic viability assessment framework, for collecting and publishing information about the insolvent firm during insolvency proceedings. This would improve transparency and predictability for viable firms seeking interim finance, empowering lenders and investors to make better-informed decisions. By supporting viable distressed firms, this framework could foster a thriving market for distressed debt in India, rescuing valuable companies from the bankruptcy abyss.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
