Abstract

This study tries to find the profiles of EFL students' critical thinking skills in writing problem-solution expository essays within wetland themes. It employs a quantitative descriptive design by utilizing a validated writing test. The subjects of the study were 40 students of the English Language Education Study Program of the University of Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia, who were enrolled in the Academic Writing courses. The essay produced by each student was measured based on the depth of cause-and-effect analysis, the logic of the argument given, the viability of the solution, and the validity of evidence used to support the argument. The findings reveal that the subjects’ critical thinking skill is categorized as medium since the mean score on the test of critical thinking is 11.38. Particularly, they have a high level of critical thinking in the aspects of analyzing the issue (3.03) and providing viable solutions (3.18). It indicates that they are able to distinguish the cause of a problem and the consequences as well and consider the causes and consequences when they propose a solution. However, their skill in providing argument is medium (2.85) whereas their skill in providing the evidence is low (2.33). These findings suggest that the subjects need to be trained in providing arguments and sufficient evidence through leading questions, discussion, and reading relevant sources. It implies that the study program needs to develop a teaching model that facilitates the students to practice their critical thinking skills.
  

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call