Abstract
As the science of team science evolves, the development of measures that assess important processes related to working in transdisciplinary teams is critical. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present the psychometric properties of scales measuring collaborative processes and transdisciplinary integration. Two hundred-sixteen researchers and research staff participating in the Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers (TTURC) Initiative completed the TTURC researcher survey. Confirmatory-factor analyses were used to verify the hypothesized factor structures. Descriptive data pertinent to these scales and their associations with other constructs were included to further examine the properties of the scales. Overall, the hypothesized-factor structures, with some minor modifications, were validated. A total of four scales were developed, three to assess collaborative processes (satisfaction with the collaboration, impact of collaboration, trust and respect) and one to assess transdisciplinary integration. All scales were found to have adequate internal consistency (i.e., Cronbach alpha's were all >0.70); were correlated with intermediate markers of collaborations (e.g., the collaboration and transdisciplinary-integration scales were positively associated with the perception of a center's making good progress in creating new methods, new science and models, and new interventions); and showed some ability to detect group differences. This paper provides valid tools that can be utilized to examine the underlying processes of team science--an important step toward advancing the science of team science.
Highlights
Several studies[1,2,3,4] have documented that, since the mid-1950s, the natural, behavioral, and social sciences have made a pronounced shift from individually oriented research toward team-based scientific initiatives
Given the substantial amount of federal and private resources that have been allocated to establish and maintain team science initiatives, it is essential that concerted efforts be made to evaluate both their near, mid, and longerterm collaborative processes and outcomes.[12,13,14]
The science-of-team-science field is at a relative early stage in its development and can benefit from the development of psychometrically valid and reliable measures of collaborative processes, especially those involving cross-disciplinary synergy and integration
Summary
Several studies[1,2,3,4] have documented that, since the mid-1950s, the natural, behavioral, and social sciences have made a pronounced shift from individually oriented research toward team-based scientific initiatives. This trend toward greater teamwork in science is paralleled by a growing emphasis on crossdisciplinary approaches to research and training.[5,6,7] Substantial investments by government agencies and. The science-of-team-science field is at a relative early stage in its development and can benefit from the development of psychometrically valid and reliable measures of collaborative processes, especially those involving cross-disciplinary synergy and integration. As these initial collaborative processes may be integrally linked to the achievement of subsequent and farreaching benefits to science and society, it is important to develop reliable and valid measures of these con-
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
