Abstract

Neuropsychiatric research has utilized cognitive testing in rodents to improve our understanding of cognitive deficits and for preclinical drug development. However, more sophisticated cognitive tasks have not been as widely exploited due to low throughput and the extensive training time required. We developed a modified signal detection task (SDT) based on the growing body of literature aimed at improving cognitive testing in rodents. This study directly compares performance on the modified SDT with a traditional test for measuring attention, the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT). Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained on either the 5CSRTT or the SDT. Briefly, the 5CSRTT required rodents to pay attention to a spatial array of five apertures and respond with a nose poke when an aperture was illuminated. The SDT required the rat to attend to a light panel and respond either left or right to indicate the presence of a signal. In addition, modifications were made to the reward delivery, timing, control of body positioning, and the self-initiation of trials. It was found that less training time was required for the SDT, with both sessions to criteria and daily session duration significantly reduced. Rats performed with a high level of accuracy (>87%) on both tasks, however omissions were far more frequent on the 5CSRTT. The signal duration was reduced on both tasks as a manipulation of task difficulty relevant to attention and a similar pattern of decreasing accuracy was observed on both tasks. These results demonstrate some of the advantages of the SDT over the traditional 5CSRTT as being higher throughput with reduced training time, fewer omission responses and their body position was controlled at stimulus onset. In addition, rats performing the SDT had comparable high levels of accuracy. These results highlight the differences and similarities between the 5CSRTT and a modified SDT as tools for assessing attention in preclinical animal models.

Highlights

  • Cognitive symptoms are the strongest predictor of functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia, yet current antipsychotic medications are no more effective in treating cognitive symptoms than those developed in the 1950’s (Green et al, 2000; Keefe et al, 2007)

  • The average number of sessions required to reach criteria with a 1 s stimulus duration was significantly greater for 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) than for the signal detection task (SDT) [t(34) = 4.75, p < 0.001, Figure 3A]

  • Trial rate was significantly greater for the SDT than the 5CSRTT [t(34) = −17.18, p < 0.001, Figure 3E] and average session duration was significantly shorter on the SDT compared to the 5CSRTT [t(20.72) = 9.17, p < 0.001, Figure 3D]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive symptoms are the strongest predictor of functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia, yet current antipsychotic medications are no more effective in treating cognitive symptoms than those developed in the 1950’s (Green et al, 2000; Keefe et al, 2007). Within the domain of attention/vigilance they selected versions of the Continuous Performance Test (CPT; Nuechterlein et al, 2008) Following these recommendations the CNTRICS (Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognitive in Schizophrenia) panel devised a similar list of tasks for evaluating these cognitive domains in animals (Carter and Barch, 2007). These tasks were selected based on evidence of face, predictive and construct validity relative to the human CPT and each has been reverse-translated back into human tasks (Demeter et al, 2008; Young et al, 2009, 2013; Worbe et al, 2014). The purpose of this study was to further develop a CPT-like task for the assessment of attention in rodents

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call