Abstract
Background: Increasing concerns emerge regarding the limited success in reproducing research results. This is a major problem for science, society and economy. Driven by industry or scientific networks, several attempts to combat this crisis are initiated. However, only few measures address the applicability and feasibility of implementation of actions into an academic research environment with limited resources. Methods: Here we propose a strategy catalogue aiming for a quality management system suitable for many research labs. Our proposal is guided by its inexpensiveness and possibility of rapid installation. Moreover, we restrict presentations of our actions on those for what we received a positive feedback by the users regarding its applicability. For this we used eLabFTW, an electronic lab book, as hub for all other components of our quality management system (QMS). Storage of lab journals and project management will be done there as well. Standard operation procedures have been introduced. Those will be stored in eLabFTW too. Furthermore, we implemented a bio bank for safer long term storage of bio samples and cryo-cultures of cell lines. Next we set up a lab meeting as feedback mechanism for the QMS. In a final step we implemented an automated pipeline to be used for example for drug screens. Results: With this effort we want to reduce individual differences in work techniques, to further improve the quality of our results. Although, just recently established, we can already observe positive outcomes in quality of experimental results, improvements in sample and data storage, stakeholder engagement and even promotion of new scientific discoveries. Conclusions: We believe that our experiences can help to establish a road map to increase value and output of preclinical research in academic labs with limited budget and personnel.
Highlights
Increasing concerns emerge regarding the limited success in reproducing research results
The database part will be the backbone of our quality management system (QMS)
We argue that due to the QMS we fulfill the requirements for storage of data and samples, according to good scientific practice guidelines, as proposed by DFG11
Summary
Increasing concerns emerge regarding the limited success in reproducing research results. Due to its immense documentation load, the establishment of a quality management system (QMS) certified with ISO 9001 standard[1] in biomedical research labs is challenging. This is true for academic labs where usually staff is changing rapidly and the progress for individual careers is often the dominator for operator’s decision making. It is shown, that a lack of quality management and transparency are two reasons for the ongoing reproducibility crisis[2,3,4]. We implemented a slim line QMS that should lead to an increase of confidence in our scientific lab outcomes by optimizing internal processes for elevated transparency and reproducibility
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have