Abstract
Recently developed devices provide detection of access recirculation (AR) and cardiopulmonary recirculation (CPR) by optical, thermal, conducimetrical, and ultrasound methods (USM). We evaluated the last one both in vitro reproducing AR by a bypass pump and in vivo. In vitro, the USM sensitivity was about 5%. In vivo, the USM was compared with the traditional urea method (UM) in 69 patients. 8.7% of the cases resulted positive by both UM and USM. One case was USM positive and UM negative. The UM sensitivity threshold was 6–10%. The accuracy (in vitro) and the repeatability (in vivo) of the USM were satisfactory. USM clearly distinguished AR from CPR. In conclusion, AR determination by USM, avoiding misleading interferences with CPR, is a rapid, easy, and noninvasive method to routinely exclude a potential cause of reduced dialytic efficiency.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
