Abstract
BackgroundPlacental elasticity may be modified in women with placental insufficiency. Shear wave elastography (SWE) can measure this, using acoustic radiation force, but the safety of its use in pregnant women has not yet been demonstrated. Transient elastography (TE) is a safer alternative, but has not yet been applied to the placenta. Moreover, the dispersion of shear wave speed (SWS) as a function of frequency has received relatively little study for placental tissue, although it might improve the accuracy of biomechanical assessment.ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and reproducibility of TE for placental analysis, to compare the values of SWS and Young’s modulus (YM) from TE and SWE, and to analyze SWS dispersion as a function of frequency ex vivo in normal placentas.Materials and methodsTen normal placentas were analyzed ex vivo by an Aixplorer ultrasound system as shear waves were generated by a vibrating plate and by using an Aixplorer system.The frequency analysis provided the value of the exponent n from a fractional rheological model applied to the TE method. We calculated intra- and interobserver agreement for SWS and YM with 95% prediction intervals, created Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and estimated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Main resultsThe mean SWS was 1.80 m/s +/- 0.28 (standard deviation) with the TE method at 50 Hz and 1.82 m/s +/-0.13 with SWE (P = 0.912). No differences were observed between the central and peripheral regions of placentas with either TE or SWE. With TE, the intraobserver ICC for SWS was 0.68 (0.50–0.82), and the interobserver ICC for SWS 0.65 (0.37–0.85). The mean parameter n obtained from the fractional rheological model was 1.21 +/- 0.12, with variable values of n for any given SWS.ConclusionsTE is feasible and reproducible on placentas ex vivo. The frequency analysis of SWS provides additional information about placental elasticity and appears to be able to distinguish differences between placental structures.
Highlights
In clinical practice, placental function is generally assessed by the following standard ultrasound (US) measurements: fetal growth, amniotic fluid index, fetal Doppler indexes, and the uterine arteryDoppler
US elastography is a relevant tool for such an analysis, because it makes it possible to observe by US waves the deformation of an environment subjected to a constraint
Some authors have recently studied the placenta by US elastography [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], but we propose a new method for this analysis
Summary
Placental function is generally assessed by the following standard ultrasound (US) measurements: fetal growth, amniotic fluid index, fetal Doppler indexes (umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, ductus venosus, and aortic isthmus), and the uterine arteryDoppler. Significant changes in placental microarchitecture have already been described in these situations, including, for example, increases or decreases in the number of villi ramifications and in fibrin deposits in term villi [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. These changes may affect the stiffness of the entire placenta, probably from early pregnancy, and can potentially be detected by elastography. The dispersion of shear wave speed (SWS) as a function of frequency has received relatively little study for placental tissue, it might improve the accuracy of biomechanical assessment
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
