Abstract

Homoarginine (hArg) is a non-essential amino acid that was identified as a risk marker for cardiovascular disease. Several analytical methods have been described for the quantification of hArg in biological samples. The aim of this study was to compare a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) approach with a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Determination of hArg concentrations in ELISA calibration standards measured by both methods revealed a correlation coefficient r (2) of 0.99, for LC-MS/MS calibrators r (2) was 0.997. However, linear regression analysis between the two assays for hArg concentrations in human plasma samples revealed a correlation coefficient r (2) of 0.78. Plasma concentrations obtained from LC-MS/MS are on average 29 % higher than those by ELISA. We investigated the hArg-isobaric N (ε)-trimethyllysine as potential source for the higher observed values, but evaluation of mass spectra indicated that N (ε)-trimethyllysine did not interfere with hArg quantification in our LC-MS/MS method. Both quantification methods were applied to measure hArg in (1) a case-control study of acute coronary syndrome and (2) L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase-deficient mice. Our LC-MS/MS and the commercially available ELISA assay are suitable for hArg measurement in human and mouse plasma, but different reference values for each method need to be considered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.