Abstract

In the present study, we compared lumbar spinal and whole-body bone mineral density (BMD) measurements to determine which is more suitable for evaluating the bone mineral status of low-birth-weight (LBW) infants. Lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD were assessed simultaneously in a prospective series including 152 Japanese LBW infants (birth weight 453-2400 g, gestational age 24-38 weeks) from the age of 40 weeks post-conception to 2 years of age. Lumbar spinal BMD at 40 weeks post-conception was significantly correlated with birth weight (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001), but wholebody BMD was not correlated with birth weight. No correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD at 40 weeks post-conception. However, after 40 weeks post-conception, a significant correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). For infants with a body weight of 4 kg or less at the time of measurement, no correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD. However, for infants with a body weight above 4 kg, a significant correlation was found between lumbar spinal and whole-body BMD (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). Thus, lumbar spinal BMD is more suitable than whole-body BMD for evaluation of the bone mineral status of LBW in early infancy. Therefore, lumbar spinal BMD should be used for serial evaluation of changes in the bone mineral status of LBW infants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call