Mean ionic activity coefficient of associative electrolyte solutions: A comparison study

Abstract

The performance of four implicit solvent models for associative and two models for non-associative electrolyte solutions has been compared and analyzed for the mean ionic activity coefficient (MIAC) of electrolytes in the solution. Two of these models for associative electrolyte solutions are based on a chemical approach (Fisher-Levin-Guillot-Guissani (FLGG) and Ebeling-Grigo (EG)), and one of them is based on the reference cavity approximation (Zhou-Yeh-Stell (ZYS)). The last one is based on the thermodynamic perturbation theory (Binding mean spherical approximation, BiMSA). Models without ion-pairing also consist of hard sphere (HS) contribution in addition to the electrostatic contribution from the Debye-Hückel (HS + DH) and the mean spherical approximation (HS + MSA) theories. To this aim, the models’ predictions are compared with the numerical solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, the Monte Carlo simulations, and the experimental data. We have shown that considering the ion pairing results in a better agreement of the predicted MIAC against both simulations and experimental data of 2:2 electrolytes. We have also adjusted the ionic diameter and the distance between ion pairs to the MIAC experimental data and validated the estimated fractions of free ions with the electrical conductivity measurements. We have shown that the FLGG model captures the physics of the system more accurately compared to other models.