Abstract
We consider the commentary by von Stumm, Hell, and Chamorro-Premuzic (in press) on our results (Powell & Nettelbeck, 2014) that typical intellectual engagement (TIE) had small incremental predictive validity for academic success and that, to the extent that this was so, it reflected something other than intellectual curiosity. We address each of the objections raised but maintain that these do not invalidate our original conclusions.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
