Abstract

In their Führerdemokratie Max and Alfred Weber assigned the key decision-making influence to an oligarchical elite of political leaders, in the caesarist version of Max's conception also to a 'plebiscitary dictator'. In Max's view, the leaders should be appointed by a party apparatus, win the elections through their charisma and distribute power, posts and profits to their followers. In Alfred's version, the voters were directly involved in the selection of the leaders. According to Max, the individual was in an 'iron cage', bound by command and obedience and at the mercy of political authority and bureaucracy. Alfred rather considered the individual as a 'person destined for freedom' and sought ways to release him from the economic, social and political pressures of modern life. A quantitative keyword content analysis of two relevant texts confirms that Max's conception of political will was based on power and force, while Alfred set store by freedom, human rights and political self-determination.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.