Abstract
This paper proposes to nuance speeches extending to Latin America about the European constitutional past, speeches that invisibilize our past in a very specific issue: constitutional interpretation. This Eurocentric discourse is the result of an exercise of colonization of Latin American legal culture that has to be put under suspicion. Similarly, this paper indicates that existed constitutional interpretation in Latin America during the nineteenth century, and proposes that the legal historian must dialogue with the constitutionalist dogmatic for to build the memory of this discipline, so that it can identify the hegemonic relations that have gestated in this juridical area. Then, during the discussions on the Bicentennial, it is important to rethink the relations that the Hispanic American constitutional law has assumed within the constitutional dogmatics from first-world, for which the history of law can make far more than it thinks.
Highlights
This paper proposes to nuance speeches extending to Latin America about the European constitutional past, speeches that invisibilize our past in a very specific issue: constitutional interpretation
This Eurocentric discourse is the result of an exercise of colonization of Latin American legal culture that has to be put under suspicion
This paper indicates that existed constitutional interpretation in Latin America during the nineteenth century, and proposes that the legal historian must dialogue with the constitutionalist dogmatic for to build the memory of this discipline, so that it can identify the hegemonic relations that have gestated in this juridical area
Summary
Assim sentencia o juiz de Direito: Vistos: 1o Considerando que José Caro, prefeito paroquial de Quirimara, prendeu em sua casa, em prisão de cepo, o Sr. Cruz Muñoz, por vinte e quatro horas, e que não lhe entregou o auto até estas vinte e quatro horas, conforme consta no próprio e de informação de nossos feitos: 2o que com estes fatos violou os artigos 18613 e 19014 da Constituição, não dando dentro de doze horas a cédula ou ordem que expresse os motivos da detenção e reclusão, e realizando esta em sua própria casa e não em lugar conhecido como prisão, e no caso de não existir esta deveria efetuar a prisão na capital da paróquia, ou punir com multa, conforme prevista no artigo 154 e seguintes da Lei de 11 de maio 1825. Que se encontra também na maioria dos textos constitucionais europeus, explicaram-se as principais características das constituições e das concepções que se utilizam para observá-las ao longo da modernidade:[18]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
