Abstract
This paper reports the results of a comparative study of the electron impact mass spectrometry data for a series of previously synthetized 5‐arylidene‐3‐(4‐chloro‐benzyl)‐4‐thioxo‐thiazolidin‐2‐one, and 5‐arylidene‐3‐(2‐biphenyl‐4‐yl‐2‐oxo‐ethyl)‐4‐thioxo‐thiazolidin‐2‐one derivatives. Theoretical calculations of molecular mechanics, MOPAC‒AM1, were used to explain the fragmentations observed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
