Abstract

The impact on ecosystems resulting from the introduction of productive activities is a consensus worldwide. However, some analyses have veered away from scientific rigor in favor of other interests. This phenomenon becomes evident when considering productive activities within the Amazon Biome. The diversity in soil structure and vegetation justifies this study and underpins its conclusions. We aimed to assess the impact of livestock farming and soybean cultivation in the state of Mato Grosso, which partially resides within the Amazon Biome. This analysis stems from the promotion of soybean production for animal feed due to the prohibition of meat and bone meal, a regulation that emerged following the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) event. The results indicate that the prohibition of meat and bone meal in animal feed as a preventive measure against BSE transmission did not influence deforestation in the Legal Amazon in the analyzed region. Similarly, it did not affect the growth of the cattle herd, land income costs, variations in soybean prices in the international market, or beef prices in Brazil. Soybean cultivation did impact deforestation in the Legal Amazon. Government policies related to deforestation were effective in reducing encroachments on the Legal Amazon. Importantly, the most significant expansion of anthropogenic land use occurred within the Cerrado Biome of Mato Grosso rather than within the portion of the Amazon Biome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call