Abstract
Background: Maraviroc is an allosteric, non-competitive blocker of CCR5, interfering with its ability to bind to the HIV GP120 and thus preventing HIV cell entry. CCR5 is involved in recruiting immune cells to sites of viral invasion in the respiratory tract. This postulated role of CCR5 led us to perform a meta-analysis of the largest clinical drug trials that evaluated CCR5 antagonists, as part of antiretroviral regimens, with focus on the occurrence of respiratory infections in general and viral infections in particular in CCR5 antagonist recipients. Data source and eligibility criteria: Clinical trials involving administration of Maraviroc to HIV infected individuals were reviewed with emphasis on reported respiratory infections. We included in the analysis those studies enrolling more than 100 participants in the maraviroc treatment arm. Results: We compared individuals treated with optimized background regimen plus placebo to those receiving the background regimen along with the CCR5 anatagonist maraviroc. We found in the clinical data significantly more respiratory infections in the CCR5 blocker treated arm than in the control arm. Limitations: The studies had limited microbiological analysis of respiratory infections and the categorization differs between the studies included. Conclusions: This observation suggests that the CCR5 blockade may lead to more infections caused by other viruses and respiratory pathogens in HIV infected patients and the incidence of such infections needs to be carefully assessed.
Highlights
The CCR5 protein is a member of the beta-chemokine-receptor family and is expressed primarily on T cells, macrophages and dendritic cells surface
We compared individuals treated with optimized background regimen plus placebo to those receiving the background regimen along with the CCR5 anatagonist maraviroc
We found in the clinical data significantly more respiratory infections in the CCR5 blocker treated arm than in the control arm
Summary
The main 3 randomized controlled trials included in this analysis were: the MERIT trial that compared maraviroc to efavirenz along with zidovudine-lamivudine in treatment-naive individuals. [17] shows a phase 2b trial of maraviroc aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug in combination with optimized background therapy, in treatment experienced individuals. The main 3 randomized controlled trials included in this analysis were: the MERIT trial that compared maraviroc to efavirenz along with zidovudine-lamivudine in treatment-naive individuals. [17] shows a phase 2b trial of maraviroc aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug in combination with optimized background therapy, in treatment experienced individuals. The MOTIVATE 1 and 2, were two randomized, placebo controlled trials studying maraviroc in treatment experienced individuals on optimized backbone therapy, with resistance to 3 anti-retroviral classes. As shown in (Table 1), lower respiratory tract infections were more common in the maraviroc treatment arms. The occurrence of upper respiratory tract infections was more common among maraviroc recipients in the MOTIVATE trials but were not reported in the two other trials
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.