Mapping the Landscape of Continuing Professional Development: A Pilot Gap Map of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Gap maps graphically represent evidence from systematic reviews. We developed and tested a pilot gap map of systematic reviews examining the impact of continuing professional development (CPD). We conducted a mapping review and charted the content of systematic reviews in a pilot gap map. Directive content analysis helped develop categories in three dimensions: evaluation framework, study characteristics, and number of systematic reviews. Of 389 identified records, 29 systematic reviews were included in the pilot map. We found gaps in evidence evaluating the impact of e-learning and skills training programs on various outcomes (patient, care, and work environment). Most evaluations corresponded to Kirkpatrick's learning model, with few considering other outcomes or how CPD could be mediated or influenced by contextual factors. Rooted in social epidemiological principles, the pilot map framework introduced new ways of understanding evidence from systematic reviews. Although the pilot map illuminated several evidence gaps and perspectives important to future CPD, a complete map is needed to validate the findings.