Abstract
The need for land is one of the fulfillments of human needs in terms of utilizing the land as a medium for farming, plantation, forestry, and so on. One of the impacts of this is the occurrence of a power struggle over land rights which causes conflict in the community. The conflict over the power struggle over the land became the basis for the presence of an agrarian conflict resolution known as the agrarian reform program, in this case, the Agrarian Reform Object Land (TORA) and Social Forestry (PS). If this program runs quickly and there are no obstacles, then the community around the forest should feel economic sovereignty because it has been successful in management, but from the results of the evaluation it was found that data, especially in South Sulawesi, has not shown a drastic improvement in the economic life of the community, this condition has explained that the TORA and PS programs have not been implemented optimally. This study aims to map internal and external actors and their relationships that have been intervening in the TORA and PS programs in South Sulawesi so that it will formulate an intervention model so that collaborative work occurs between actors. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive approach by describing all actors and then analyzed using power relations analysis and PIL actor analysis (P=Power, I=Interest, and L=legitimate) seen from the characteristics of the actor's characteristics. and policy analysis. For TORA actors using power relations analysis by looking at the patronization of actors, three bureaucracies are the most influential patrons and/or actors and take vital roles in the process of implementing TORA/PTKH in South Sulawesi Province. The bureaucratic patronages are: (a) South Sulawesi Provincial Forestry Service; (b) ATR/BPN Regional Office of South Sulawesi Province; and (c) Forest Area Consolidation Center (BPKH) of South Sulawesi Province. While PS uses PIL actor analysis, it is owned by the South Sulawesi Provincial Forestry Service, Watershed Management Center (BPDAS), Sulawesi Social Forestry, and Environmental Partnership for the PIL category Center (BPSKL). The PL (Power Legitimacy) category is owned by the Hasanuddin University Institution, the PI (Power Interest) category is owned by RECOFTC, CIFOR, and AgFor. The IL (Interest Legitimacy) category is owned by the Forestry Extension Officer. Category I (Interest) is owned by SCF, Balang, Kareso, Lampion, Yagrobitama, Walda, TLKM, and AMAN.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.