Abstract

Innovative high-frequency magnetic sensors have been designed and manufactured in-house for installation on the Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV), which are now routinely operational during the TCV experimental campaigns. These sensors combine the Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) and the classical thick-film technologies and are in various aspects similar to the majority of the in-vessel inductive magnetic sensors foreseen for ITER (around 450 out of the 505 currently being procured are of the LTCC-1D type). The TCV LTCC-3D magnetic sensors provide measurements in the frequency range up to 1 MHz of the perturbations to the wall-aligned toroidal (δBTOR), vertical (δBVER), and radial (δBRAD) magnetic field components. Knowledge of the equilibrium at the last closed flux-surface allows us to then obtain the field-aligned parallel (δBPAR ∼ δBTOR), poloidal (δBPOL), and normal (δBNOR) components, the latter being in most cases rather different from the vertical and radial components, respectively. The main design principles were aimed at increasing the effective area and reducing the self-inductance of the sensor in each of the three measurement axes, which are centered at the same position on each sensor, while reducing the mutual and parasitic coupling between them by optimizing the on-board wiring. The physics requirements are set by the installation of two high-power/high-energy neutral beam injection systems on TCV, i.e., studying fast ions physics, coherent instabilities, and turbulence in the (super-)Alfvénic frequency range. In this paper, we report the manufacturing, installation, and commissioning work for these high-frequency LTCC-3D magnetic sensors and conclude with an overview of illustrative experimental results obtained with this system. The LTCC-3D data provide new insights into the δBPOL coherent (eigenmodes, up to ∼400 kHz) and in-coherent background turbulent fluctuations in the higher frequency range up to ∼1 MHz, which were not previously available with the TCV Mirnov sensors. Furthermore, the LTCC-3D δBPOL measurements allow us to cross-check the data obtained with the standard Mirnov coils and have led to the identification of largeelectromagnetic (EM) noise pick-up for the Mirnov data acquisition (DAQ). When the sources of EM noise pick-up on the Mirnov DAQ are removed, the LTCC-3D data for δBPOL are in good overall agreement, i.e., within the expected measurement uncertainties, with those obtained with the standard Mirnov sensors located at the same poloidal position in the frequency range where the respective data acquisition overlap, routinely up to 125 kHz and up to 250 kHz in some discharges. The LTCC-3D δBPAR measurements (not previously available in TCV or elsewhere) provide evidence that certain instabilities have a finite parallel δB at the wall, hence at the LCFS, consistent with the recent theoretical results for pressure-driven modes. The LTCC-3D δBNOR measurements improve significantly on the corresponding measurements with the saddle loops, which are mounted onto the wall and have a bandwidth of ∼3 kHz (due to the wall penetration time). A detailed end-to-end system modeling tool has been developed and applied to test on the simulated data the actual measurement capabilities of this new diagnostic system and obtain the ensuing estimates of the intrinsic measurement uncertainties. A detailed error analysis is then performed so that, finally, fully calibrated, absolute measurements of the frequency-dependent amplitude and spectral breaks of coherent eigenmodes and in-coherent broadband magnetic fluctuations are provided for the first time in physical units with quantitative uncertainties.

Highlights

  • The Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) technology is a well-known industry standard widely used in harsh environmental conditions, such as high-temperature, high-vacuum, and highradiation, covering a large spectrum of applications.1 Based on the prototyping work performed mostly in-house at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)2–6 that started in 2007, the majority of the ITER in-vessel inductive magnetic sensors currently being procured are of the Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC)-1D technology

  • Coming back to the simplified approach we have used to account for the mutual coupling between the different measurement axes, we can confirm the argument previously presented, namely, the need to rely on a different and more efficient algorithm to remove the signal contribution, which is due to the lowerfrequency, quasi-DC components in the δBMEAS(ω, t) spectrum, this purpose being served precisely by the analysis presented in this subsection

  • This work is reported where we focus on three main elements: the Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) analysis, the tests on the correct detection of modes, and the comparison of the data acquired for the δBPOL field component by Mirnov and LTCC-3D sensors located at the same poloidal position in the frequency range where the bandwidth of these two systems overlaps

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) technology is a well-known industry standard widely used in harsh environmental conditions, such as high-temperature, high-vacuum, and highradiation, covering a large spectrum of applications. Based on the prototyping work performed mostly in-house at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) that started in 2007, the majority of the ITER in-vessel inductive magnetic sensors (around 450 out of 5057) currently being procured are of the LTCC-1D technology. The Mirnov sensors currently installed on TCV for measuring δBPOL have a bandwidth of around 90 kHz, which is, reduced to ∼50 kHz due to a much deteriorating Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) and pick-up of EM noise from various ex-vessel sources These Mirnov sensors are not well-suited for these high-frequency, high-k measurements and do not provide measurements of δBTOR or δBRAD. Two δBTOR measurements (in sectors 14B and 16A) turned out to be affected by poor screening to ground

DATA ACQUISITION ELECTRONICS
SENSOR ELECTRICAL CHARACTERIZATION
END-TO-END SYSTEM COMMISSIONING
End-to-end transfer function in the digital z-domain
End-to-end transfer function
BASIC DATA ANALYSIS PROCESSING
Parasitic and mutual coupling contribution
Field-alignment of geometrical measurement axes
Calibration of the data in the digital domain
Overall error analysis for the LTCC-3D measurements
SYSTEM MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE
Testing the correct detection of modes
Comparison with the Mirnov sensors for δBPOL measurements
A mini saddle loop
Perturbation of the toroidal field
CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT
Findings
Scientific
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call