Abstract

In a laboratory study, manganese amended activated alumina (MAA), prepared by calcining (400°C) manganese acetate-impregnated activated alumina, showed promise as a more effective medium than activated alumina (AA) for use in small municipal drinking water systems or point-of-use treatment, for removing arsenic [As(III) and As(V)] from groundwater. Batch adsorption/oxidation kinetic tests indicated that in fixed-bed operation, with a bed flowthrough time of 10–20min, MAA would be a more effective medium than AA in removing arsenic [As(V), As(III), and As(III) and As(V) (present together)] from groundwater. In three cycles of downflow column test [bed depth 200mm; bed flowthrough time 20min; influent arsenic 1.0–0.6mg∕L As(III) and 0.4mg∕L As(V)], breakthrough bed volumes at the World Health Organization guideline value of 0.01mg∕L for arsenic in drinking water were 580, 550, and 485, and 825, 770, and 695, respectively, for AA and MAA. During regeneration (backwashing with a sodium hydroxide solution), 84–88% (for AA) and 86–89% (for MAA) of the removed arsenic was recovered. Manganese concentration in the MAA column effluent was low (below 0.02mg∕L). A detailed study addressing the effects of some important factors (water pH, concentration and type of competing ions, and fouling by organics) on the process is needed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.