Abstract
A large proportion of the academic literature about the agency problem focuses on corporate governance or the instruments that can be used to balance the incentives of shareholders and debt holders. Following the real options company valuation framework, one method to increase shareholder value involves increasing the intrinsic risk of the firm; however, such a practice reduces the bondholder value. We analyzed an innovative balance sheet instrument, the mandatory convertible bond, as a means to increase financial sustainability of companies, improving the value for shareholders without increasing the perceived default risk. The results of the empirical analysis illustrate that for companies in a weak credit position, the agency problem can be mitigated by the issuance of mandatory convertible bonds, which allows managers to increase company risk without being detrimental for bondholders. However, when the probability of distress is small, shareholders have less incentive to increase company risk than in a company funded by mandatory convertible bonds, being more aligned with bondholders. A better alignment of debt holders and shareholders incentives reduces inefficiencies, mitigates the probably of distress, and improves the long-term financial sustainability of companies and can promote stable growth and innovation.
Highlights
The classical agency problem between shareholders, debt holders, and company management arises when the objectives of the company managers are different from the interests of the owners of the company—the shareholders
Debt holders are more protected against default, since they have a preferential claim on the company assets, senior to mandatory convertible bonds (MCBs) bondholders and equity holders
The linear regression models show that after the issuance of MCBs, the influence on company volatility of market observed ratios related to debt holders decreases
Summary
The classical agency problem between shareholders, debt holders, and company management arises when the objectives of the company managers are different from the interests of the owners of the company—the shareholders. This misalignment of objectives generates inefficiencies and costs that reduce the investments in innovation and affect the longer-term financial sustainability of companies. Company managers can be incentivized to primarily defend the interests of bondholders instead of shareholders, and projects with a higher risk profile that could maximize the equity value of the company and induce innovation are discarded [1]. The inputs of the model were a company value volatility of 23%, time length of 3 years, which is the standard market MCB maturity, upper conversion trigger of the MCB of 120%, proportion of equity 40%, proportion of MCB 10%, and risk-free rate 1%
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have