Mandatory continuing professional development requirements: what does this mean for Australian nurses

Kay Ross,Jennieffer Barr,John Stevens

doi:10.1186/1472-6955-12-9

Kay Ross, Jennieffer Barr + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-12-9

Copy DOI

Journal: BMC nursing	Publication Date: Mar 27, 2013
Citations: 111	License type: CC BY 2.0

Affiliation: Southern Cross University

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper presents a discussion related to the recent decision in Australia to introduce mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for nurses. Historically there has been international debate surrounding mandatory CPD requirements; this debate is ongoing as Australian nurses face a diverse range of CPD offerings from a variety of providers.DiscussionThe purpose of this paper is to examine how mandatory CPD requirements for national nursing registration in Australia have evolved and to present an analysis of what this will mean for Australian nurses. What is yet to be determined is how to measure professional development and the effectiveness of professional development education. This is important to the international community with consensus in the literature that professional development is linked to ongoing education. Contradicting arguments are presented about whether this professional development should be mandatory.SummaryPresenting a contemporary discussion about the current and potential impact of mandatory CPD requirements for nurses, this discussion paper utilises the case of Australia’s current national policy and CPD operation to examine the choices that nurses make in order to fulfil their legislative requirements. Additional arguments are presented about the barriers nurses face in undertaking CPD. The quest for effective CPD is complex and should incorporate different situations for nurses and individual learning styles.

Highlights

This paper presents a discussion related to the recent decision in Australia to introduce mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for nurses
Summary: Presenting a contemporary discussion about the current and potential impact of mandatory CPD requirements for nurses, this discussion paper utilises the case of Australia’s current national policy and CPD operation to examine the choices that nurses make in order to fulfil their legislative requirements
Additional arguments are presented about the barriers nurses face in undertaking CPD

Summary

Introduction

This paper presents a discussion related to the recent decision in Australia to introduce mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for nurses. There has been international debate surrounding mandatory CPD requirements; this debate is ongoing as Australian nurses face a diverse range of CPD offerings from a variety of providers. This paper contributes to the global discussion about mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for health care professionals, nurses. In many countries ongoing investment in sustaining current evidence based knowledge to ensure appropriate provision. Human resources are seen as the most important contribution to health care [8]. As knowledge changes and new tools, technologies and procedures are developed, on-going education and training for health care professionals is seen as a key investment strategy [9]. A great deal of literature [2,4,10,11,12,13,14] has focused on appropriate educational approaches to ensuring effective CPD

Objectives

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion