Abstract

Much of the leading work on international suffers from an implicit bias favoring analysis of crises in which the protagonists are great/ superpowers with roughly comparable levels of gross military capabilities. As a result, it is unclear whether the management prescriptions derived from this experience base can be usefully applied to crises characterized by highly asymmetrical gross military capability structures, i.e., superpower versus small state. In this paper, central prescriptions from the management literature are applied to the 1981 U-137 (Whiskey on the Rocks) involving Sweden and the USSR as a first step in exploring this concern. The analysis focuses on the management problem from the point of view of the smaller state. Empirical manifestations of capability asymmetry are discussed, as are compensating asymmetries which may mitigate a seemingly unfavorable military capability structure. Tentative observations of a small state crisis management style are submitted as a preliminary knowledge base for improving our understanding of the increasingly important asymmetrical management problematique.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.