Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which potential financial reporting benefits from capitalizing and amortizing R&D costs depend on increasing the level of discretion permitted to financial statement preparers. To provide evidence on this issue, we examine the impact of alternative accounting schemes for R&D costs on the extent to which earnings and book values jointly explain the observed distribution of share prices. One alternative requires firms to capitalize and amortize R&D outlays, but provides them with no more discretion than that permitted under current rules. The other alternatives reflect increasing discretion over which R&D costs are recognized as assets and the periods over which these assets are amortized. We find that ability to explain the distribution of share prices increases with discretion, and conclude that substantial managerial discretion is likely to be a necessary (though hardly sufficient) ingredient of any alternative R&D accounting scheme that is capable of producing economically significant financial reporting benefits.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.