Abstract

Abstract Apple is considered the most important fruit crop in temperate areas and profitable production depends on multiple ecosystem services, including the reduction of pest damage and the provision of sufficient pollination levels. Management approaches present an inherent trade‐off as each affects species differently. We quantified the direct and indirect effects of management (organic vs. integrated pest management, IPM) on species richness, ecosystem services, and fruit production in 85 apple orchards in three European countries. We also quantified how habit composition influenced these effects at three spatial scales: within orchards, adjacent to orchards, and in the surrounding landscape. Organic management resulted in 48% lower yield than IPM, and also that the variation between orchards was large with some organic orchards having a higher yield than the average yield of IPM orchards. The lower yield in organic orchards resulted directly from management practices, and from higher pest damage in organic orchards. These negative yield effects were partly offset by indirect positive effects from more natural enemies and higher flower visitation rates in organic orchards. Two factors other than management affected species richness and ecosystem services. Higher cover of flowering plants within and adjacent to the apple trees increased flower visitation rates by pollinating insects and a higher cover of apple orchards in the landscape decreased species richness of beneficial arthropods. The species richness of beneficial arthropods in orchards was uncorrelated with fruit production, suggesting that diversity can be increased without large yield loss. At the same time, organic orchards had 38% higher species richness than IPM orchards, an effect that is likely due to differences in pest management. Synthesis and applications. Our results indicate that organic management is more efficient than integrated pest management in developing environmentally friendly apple orchards with higher species richness. We also demonstrate that there is no inherent trade‐off between species richness and yield. Development of more environmentally friendly means for pest control, which do not negatively affect pollination services, needs to be a priority for sustainable apple production.

Highlights

  • Fruit consumption is an important part of human nutrition, and the second most important fruit crop globally is apple (FAO, 2018)

  • Organic management resulted in 48% lower yield than integrated pest management (IPM), and that the variation between orchards was large with some organic orchards having a higher yield than the average yield of IPM orchards

  • When analysing the combined direct and indirect effects of management on fruit production, we found that organic orchards on average had a 48% lower fruit production compared to IPM orchards (F1, 76 = 20.9, p < 0.0001) and this effect size did not vary between countries (F2, 76 = 2.1, p > 0.13)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Fruit consumption is an important part of human nutrition, and the second most important fruit crop globally is apple (FAO, 2018). We evaluated the role of management (organic vs IPM) in a study design accounting for agri-­environmental structures and landscape composition affecting diversity at three spatial scales: within orchards, adjacent to orchards, and in the surrounding landscape The variables include both floral resources for pollinators and overwintering sites for all arthropods, estimated through the cover of flowering plants and the area of agri-­environmental structures within and close to the orchard, and the amounts of bee-­friendly habitats in a larger area around the orchard, which may increase the species pool for the local orchard. We collected data on flower visitation rates, pollination deficits, natural enemies, pests and fruit production, and used a structural equation model to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of management and environmental variables on seed set and fruit production

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call