Effects of Ground Cover Management on Biotic Communities, Ecosystem Services and Disservices in Organic Deciduous Fruit Orchards in South Africa

Klaus Birkhofer,Charles Haddad,Antoinette P Malan,Sheila G Storey,Fredrik Arvidsson,Corinna Bazelet,Charlene Janion-Scheepers,Pia Addison,Wijnand J Swart,Ruan Booysen,Matthew F Addison,Schalk Louw,Janne Bengtsson,Caro Kapp,Des Conlong,Regina Lindborg

doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00107

Abstract

Organic orchards may have higher biodiversity and levels of ecosystem services compared to conventionally managed orchards. However, it is not well understood how management decisions within organic orchards alter biotic communities and ecosystem service levels. The simultaneous provision of individual ecosystem services and mitigation of disservices is crucial for organic growers who cannot replace natural regulatory processes by artificial inputs. This study addresses one of the major constraints for organic fruit production in South Africa, namely the availability of strategies for pest control and nutrient management in soils. A field experiment was established to study the impact of a treatment with dead organic mulch compared to controls on the composition of biotic communities, the simultaneous provision of ecosystem services, and the mitigation of disservices in organic pome fruit orchards in the Western Cape Province. Mulching did not significantly reduce weed cover or alter the taxonomic composition of weed communities, but affected soil organisms. Mulched subplots had significantly higher densities of Collembola and phytophagous nematodes and lower microbial activity and woodlice numbers. Independent of mulch treatment, both orchard type (conventional: apricot & organic: apricot, peach, plum and quince) and weed cover had pronounced effects on the composition of biotic communities and associated ecosystem service and disservice potentials. The community composition of plants, microbes and web-building spiders differed significantly between organically and conventionally managed plots. The composition of communities and levels of ecosystem service and disservice potentials also differed significantly between organic orchards of different fruit type. The two potential pest groups (phytophagous nematodes and arthropods) were most abundant in peach subplots with high weed cover and tree age and least abundant in conventionally managed apricot plots. These results emphasize the crucial importance to consider weed-microbe-animal interactions when developing management practices in organic orchards. Management decisions in organic orchards hold the potential to affect biotic communities to the benefit of pest control and soil nutrient services, but can also result in unexpected detrimental effects on ecosystem services.

Highlights

The global demand for organically farmed products is continuously increasing (Willer and Lernoud, 2019) and organic farming practices may benefit several key ecosystem services (Birkhofer et al, 2016)
Organic growers have to rely on the provision of multiple ecosystem services, as they cannot replace natural regulatory processes by artificial inputs
The provision of ecosystem services and mitigation of disservices in organic production systems can be actively supported by management practices (Marliac et al, 2015, 2016), but it remains largely unknown to what extent individual orchard management practices affect the relationships between community composition and ecosystem services (Birkhofer et al, 2018)

Summary

Introduction

The global demand for organically farmed products is continuously increasing (Willer and Lernoud, 2019) and organic farming practices may benefit several key ecosystem services (Birkhofer et al, 2016). As ecosystem disservices, may have higher levels under organic farming (Muneret et al, 2018). It is less well-understood how management differences within organic orchards alter the composition of biotic communities and levels of associated ecosystem services. This limitation is evident for the simultaneous management of biodiversity and multiple services and disservices (Birkhofer et al, 2015; Demestihas et al, 2017). The provision of ecosystem services and mitigation of disservices in organic production systems can be actively supported by management practices (Marliac et al, 2015, 2016), but it remains largely unknown to what extent individual orchard management practices affect the relationships between community composition and ecosystem services (Birkhofer et al, 2018)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion