Abstract

The optimization of Russian secondary education carried out in 2010-2014 intending to strengthen the role of municipal authorities had some negative consequences. For instance, territorial educational authorities started receiving complaints about the violation of labor standards, and teachers began to quit their jobs. The purpose of this paper is to study the dependence of the dysfunctions manifested in the general education system on the management methods used by municipal authorities. The research method involves an all-Russian representative expert survey (2018) of specialists employed at territorial and municipal education authorities. The results of the study showed that the cause of destructive phenomena that had occurred in the field of work regulation of the general education system and made teachers quit their jobs was the domination of the administrative principle in the selection of personnel at the municipal level. The prescriptive management methods began to prevail at schools because the optimization of schools and changes in teacher standards in connection with higher teachers’ salaries were supervised by federal educational authorities, which stimulated municipal authorities to strengthen directorial management methods in the interests of the successful implementation of the optimization program. For this reason, municipal authorities began to select specialists with good managerial abilities, paying less attention to their creative side. The study showed that the priority of directive character in the work of municipal education administration bodies was generated by the excessive role of federal bodies in coordinating the territorial education system in labor-regulating and financial aspects. Conclusion: the federal system of general education management needs to be decentralized and creativity should be prioritized in the selection of specialists for municipal education authorities.

Highlights

  • The Russian Federation (RF) is characterized by a pyramidal structure for managing the education system in terms of standardizing the work of teachers and financial subsidies for educational organizations: the first level is occupied by the Ministry of education of the RF

  • Which implements the functions of the overall coordination of the education system; the second level — by the territorial bodies of education management, carrying out the management of the corporate and supervisory type; the third level — by municipal education authorities with directory and supervisory functions; the fourth level — by educational organizations with the administrative and technological type of management

  • The results of the study allowed us to formulate a hypothesis that the cause of negative phenomena in schools lied in the destructive logistics of management at the municipal level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Russian Federation (RF) is characterized by a pyramidal structure for managing the education system in terms of standardizing the work of teachers and financial subsidies for educational organizations: the first level is occupied by the Ministry of education of the RF, which implements the functions of the overall coordination of the education system; the second level — by the territorial bodies of education management (of the constituent entities of the RF), carrying out the management of the corporate and supervisory type; the third level — by municipal education authorities with directory and supervisory functions; the fourth level — by educational organizations with the administrative and technological type of management. According to the data of the study conducted by us, up to 40% of teachers feel constant physical fatigue, and up to 30% complain of psychological fatigue [4]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.