Abstract
Poor mammography quality control results in the loss of important diagnostic information. Several organizations and agencies recommend or require that mammography quality assurance procedures include the periodic evaluation of equipment. The objective of this study was to assess compliance with published guidelines pertaining to the monitoring of mammography equipment. One hundred eighty-four Washington state mammography facilities were surveyed by mail during late 1989 and early 1990. The response rate was 71%. A large proportion of facilities was not complying with published guidelines concerning the frequency of evaluation of processor parameters and phantom image quality. Results suggest that many facilities were not in compliance with American College of Radiology recommendations concerning annual system evaluation by a physicist. The results of this study reinforce the importance of establishing minimum quality assurance standards and indicate a need for more mammography quality assurance technologist training.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.