Abstract

Experiments to investigate bone's physiological adaptation to mechanical loading frequently employ models that apply dynamic loads to bones in vivo and assess the changes in mass and architecture that result. It is axiomatic that bones will only show an adaptive response if the applied artificial loading environment differs in a significant way from that to which the bones have been habituated by normal functional loading. It is generally assumed that this normal loading is similar between experimental groups. In the study reported here we found that this was not always the case. Male and female 17-week-old C57BL/6 mice were housed in groups of six, and a single episode (40cycles) of non-invasive axial loading, engendering 2,200με on the medial surface of the proximal tibiae in sample mice, was applied to right tibiae on alternate days for two weeks. This engendered an adaptive increase in bone mass in females, but not males. Observation revealed the main difference in behaviour between males and females was that males were involved in fights 1.3 times per hour, whereas the females never fought. We therefore housed all mice individually. In females, there was a similar significant osteogenic response to loading in cortical and trabecular bone of both grouped and individual mice. In contrast, in males, adaptive increases in the loaded compared with non-loaded control bones was only apparent in animals housed individually. Our interpretation of these findings is that the frequent vigorous fighting that occurs between young adult males housed in groups could be sufficient to engender peak strains and strain rates that equal or exceed the stimulus derived from artificial loading. This indicates the importance of ensuring that physical activity is consistent between groups. Reducing the background level of the naturally engendered strain environment allows adaptive responses to artificial loading to be demonstrated at lower loads.

Highlights

  • Bone architecture adapts to changes in mechanical strain engendered by its local functional loading environment [1]

  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying this adaptation, mouse models have been developed in which dynamic mechanical loads are applied in vivo to one limb, and adaptive changes to bone architecture measured and compared to the situation in contralateral non-loaded limbs [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These artificially applied loads will only stimulate an adaptive response if the strains they engender differ significantly from those experienced during normal, day-to-day physical activity [8,9]

  • We evaluated the effect of housing and sex on both tibiae and changes [(right–left)/ left] due to loading in bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N) in the trabecular region (0.25–0.75 mm distal to the proximal physis) and cortical bone area (Ct.Ar), total cross-sectional area inside the periosteal envelope (Tt.Ar), medullary area (Ma.Ar), cortical area fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and polar moment of inertia (J), a parameter of structural bone strength, at the cortical site (37% from the proximal end), according to ASBMR guidelines [15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bone architecture adapts to changes in mechanical strain engendered by its local functional loading environment [1]. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this adaptation, mouse models have been developed in which dynamic mechanical loads are applied in vivo to one limb, and adaptive changes to bone architecture measured and compared to the situation in contralateral non-loaded limbs [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] These artificially applied loads will only stimulate an adaptive response if the strains they engender differ significantly from those experienced during normal, day-to-day physical activity [8,9]. In an initial pilot study the response to loading in male mice appeared inconsistent and markedly lower than that in females Since this was unexpected [7,11] we investigated the behaviour of these mice. Differences in behaviour between group-housed males and females led us to perform the study we report here in which the response to unilateral tibial loading in animals housed individually was compared to that in animals housed in groups

Materials and Methods
Results
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call