Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. Objectives: For residency programs with a mandatory research component, it is challenging to match residents with optimal preceptors and projects early in residency to expedite project completion. An evaluation of a "Speed Dating" format adopted in 2011 to match pediatric residents with research preceptors was performed. Methods: Residents and preceptors who participated in Speed Dating 2011 through 2016 were surveyed for their views on the process. Additionally, research output by residents with access to Speed Dating was measured, Results: Forty of 52 preceptors (77%) and 48 of 54 residents (89%) responded of which 32 preceptors and 46 residents had attended Speed Dating. Of 32 preceptors, 18 (56%) had found "a match" and 16 (50%) considered Speed Dating to be a very good strategy for matching residents with preceptors. Twenty-six of 46 residents (57%) had selected their project, preceptor or both from Speed Dating and 34 of 48 who responded to the survey (71%) preferred Speed Dating vs simply receiving a list of potential preceptors and projects. Twenty-eight residents who trained in the Speed Dating era and have completed their general pediatric training reported 30 presentations at conferences and 25 publications stemming from work completed during residency with only 3 (11%) having no presentations or publications. Conclusions: Residents tended to have a more positive attitude towards Speed Dating than did preceptors but most participants were neutral or enthusiastic about this method of matching residents with preceptors The majority of residents chose a project or preceptor or both at Speed Dating. The rate of research project completion and dissemination was high.

Highlights

  • A few days prior to the first Speed Dating session, we provide residents with the names of research preceptors, their pediatric specialty, their one-paragraph summary as described above and their contact information

  • Eight of the 40 had not attended Speed Dating, yielding data from 32 preceptors who had participated in Speed Dating once (n=16), at least once (n=5) and more than once (n=11)

  • Preceptor suggestions to improve Speed Dating included: provision of a formal "second date" if the resident wanted more information, provision of a formal template to submit their proposals prior to Speed Dating, clearer guidelines regarding the components of a successful project, and a mechanism to gauge the level of interest in their project such that a preceptor would not attend Speed Dating if there was no interest in their proposal

Read more

Summary

Objectives

For residency programs with a mandatory research component, it is challenging to match residents with optimal preceptors and projects early in residency to expedite project completion. An evaluation of a "Speed Dating" format adopted in 2011 to match pediatric residents with research preceptors was performed

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call