Abstract
According to the dominant Western paradigm of aesthetic reception, what distinguishes works of art from everyday objects is that they offer an aesthetic experience exclusively through the privileged sense of sight. Correspondingly, theories of reception aesthetics in the fine arts, which seek to understand the ways in which works of art engage viewers in the process of meaning-making, traditionally focus on visual perception. However, contemporary works of art engage so-called “viewers” in increasingly multisensory ways that warrant not only a revision of the outdated and contentious privilege of the ocular in aesthetic reception, but correspondingly, a contemporary theory of reception aesthetics that considers multisensory forms of perception. Therefore, this article asks: how might the design of everyday objects – which engage users in visual as well as tactile, proprioceptive, auditory, olfactory, and gustatory ways – contribute to a theory of reception aesthetics that can illuminate and inform the ways in which sensory works of art engage audiences in the process of meaning-making? Drawing on Wolfgang Kemp’s theory of reception aesthetics on the one hand and Donald Norman’s theory of design on the other, this article proposes a methodology for analysing the impact of artistic productions in design terms (namely, affordances, constraints, signifiers, feedback, mapping, and conceptual model). Subsequently, it offers a “keyhole” comparison of an everyday object (a Rubik’s Cube) and a multisensory work of art (Lygia Clark’s Critter [1960]), whereby the interaction analysis of the former illuminates the multisensory ways in which the latter engages its audience in the process of meaning-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.