Abstract

The term User Experience (UX) was introduced to define the dynamics of the human-product interaction, and it was thought that design would have been a main recipient of UX research. However, it can be claimed that the outcomes of UX studies were not seamlessly transferred into design research and practice. Among the possible reasons, this paper addresses the fragmentary knowledge ascribable to the field of UX. The authors reviewed the literature analyzing the conceptual contributions that interpret UX, proposing definitions and/or a theoretical framework. This allowed the authors to provide an overview of recurring elements of UX, highlighting their relationships and affecting factors. This research aims to clarify the overall understanding of UX, along with its key components (the user, interaction, the system, and context) and dimensions (ergonomic, affective, and the cognitive experiences). The authors built a semantic construction inspired by the structure of a grammatical sentence to highlight the relationship between those components. Therefore, UX is defined by a subject/user who performs an action-interaction towards an object-system. A complement-context better defines the condition(s) where the action-interaction takes place. This work is expected to lay the foundations for the understanding of approaches and methods employed in UX studies, especially in design.

Highlights

  • Recent reviews focus on specific approaches or aspects of User Experience (UX) only [10,11]. These works do not contribute to an overall view of UX, especially if we focus on design, where a holistic and comprehensive understanding of product experience represents a pressing need [12,13]

  • UX interpretations provided by literature contributions are they are subjected to the effect of the affecting factors as well

  • UX limitations are highlighted by several scholars

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. UX is multifaceted and multidisciplinary [1,2,3,4]. It is studied in a variety of heterogeneous subjects such as psychology, anthropology, philosophy, computer science, as well as technical subjects like engineering, and design. Such a broad concept is difficult to synthesize [5,6].

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call