Maize residue input rather than cover cropping influenced N2O emissions and soil–crop N dynamics during the intercrop and cash crop periods

Abstract

The well-known benefits of cover cropping for mitigating climate change and improving soil quality could be threatened by increased greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, such practices could have negative consequences in the context of global climate change. The present year-long field experiment, carried out under irrigated semiarid conditions, evaluated the effect of returning maize crop residues at two topsoil input levels in combination with bare fallow, a cereal (barley, Hordeum vulgare L.) and a legume (vetch, Vicia sativa L.) as cover crops as part of an annual cover crop–cash crop (maize, Zea mays L.) rotation. In addition, control plots, without the addition of nitrogen fertilizer (either in the previous cropping season or during the experiment), were established following the same experimental design in order to assess the carry-over impact of residual nitrogen from prior crops. Nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes were measured together with soil mineral nitrogen and crop yields and nitrogen use efficiency. The significant effect of maize residue input on N2O emissions during the cover crop phase (this was 43% greater for the lower maize residue input than for the higher) was offset after subsequent maize fertilization (there was a 170% increase following the higher maize residue input compared to the lower). Although no differences in soil mineral nitrogen content were reported between treatments before maize fertilization, N2O emissions were 72% higher on the fertilized plots than on the control plots. Before maize fertilization, N2O emissions were increased by the incorporation of cover crop residues and soil rewetting after irrigation, with the highest N2O fluxes being reported for the cereal crop. Cumulative CO2 fluxes were higher in the plots with cover crops (cereal and legume) than in bare fallow plots, while CH4 sink was not affected by cover cropping or maize residue input. The grain yield penalty for maize production (a 7% decrease) with the legume cover crop on the nitrogen fertilized plots (the opposite of what was observed in the control area) highlights the need for an accurate estimation of the nitrogen supply from the mineralization of legume residues. Overall, cover crop and maize residue input did not have any significant effect on annual cumulative N2O emissions, so the positive effects of these practices should be considered to recommend them under semiarid conditions for climate change mitigation and adaptation.