Abstract
The Constitution of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) confers authority to the Constitutional Court to decide disputes on the results of general elections. Theoretically, this authority develops the Constitutional Court as the election court. According to this background, this article proposes a theoretical reflection over the Constitutional Court’s role as the election court. The main issue is theoretical reflection on judging. The theory is normative because it claims about what should the Constitutional Court do instead of what did the Constitutional Court do. As the principle, it suggests prudentiality first and judicial activism second. This theory is to criticize, and then to correct, the Constitutional Court practices as the election court in the past.
Highlights
The Constitution of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) confers authority to the Constitutional Court to decide disputes on the results of general elections
this article proposes a theoretical reflection over the Constitutional Court's role as the election court
Pan Mohammad Faiz K., The Role of Constitutional Court in Securing Constitutional Government in Indonesia (Ph.D Thesis, The University of Queensland 2016)
Summary
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum p-ISSN 2541-4984 | e-ISSN 2541-5417 Volume 3 Nomor 1, Oktober 2018, Halaman 33-48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2018.v3.i1.p33-48 Open access at: http://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum Penerbit: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have