Abstract
Authority in resolving disputes regarding the results of general elections is the authority of the constitutional court granted by the constitution. While the authority in resolving violations is structured, systematic and massive is the authority of the electoral supervisory body granted by law. In the dispute over the results of the general election, which was decided by the constitutional court, the constitutional court did not have the authority to test the petition filed on the basis of a structured, systematic and massive violation because the constitutional court only based on the dispute over the results as intended in its authority. The court verdict has been in accordance with the authority held according to the original instruction given by the constitution, which wants the implementation of elections that are sovereign and carried out on a direct, public, free, confidential, honest and fair basis.
Highlights
The study of structured, systematic and massive violations is still a new thing in the implementation of general elections in Indonesia, as well as in countries that adhere to the principle of democracy, this has not become a norm
This placement of violations of systematic and massive structured elections is part of the administrative violations that were formed in line with the establishment of a general election supervisory body to carry out tasks in examining, hearing and deciding reports submitted by citizens, participants and election observers generally are based on findings made by the Election Supervisory Body in accordance with the results of the supervisory attached as part of its authority
General elections are the embodiment of popular sovereignty as stated in the constitution, which is carried out every five years, according to the principle of direct, general, confidential, honest and fair
Summary
The study of structured, systematic and massive violations is still a new thing in the implementation of general elections in Indonesia, as well as in countries that adhere to the principle of democracy, this has not become a norm. In Indonesia itself has a mechanism for resolving disputes or disputes such as those in other countries, Indonesia implements a mechanism called handling electoral violations This placement of violations of systematic and massive structured elections is part of the administrative violations that were formed in line with the establishment of a general election supervisory body to carry out tasks in examining, hearing and deciding reports submitted by citizens, participants and election observers generally are based on findings made by the Election Supervisory Body in accordance with the results of the supervisory attached as part of its authority. Supervision Supervision carried out by the Election Supervisory Body covers, (i) supervising the preparation of general elections, consisting of planning and scheduling stages of elections, logistics procurement planning by electoral commissions, dissemination of general elections, and other preparations in holding general elections in accordance with e-ISSN : 2549-8282 http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/laj/11811 regulatory provisions legislation, (ii) Supervise the implementation of the stages of general elections consisting of updating voter data and stipulating the temporary voter list as well as the final voter list, arrangement and determination of electoral districts, determination of election participants, nomination up to the determination of candidate pairs, candidate members of the People's Representative Council, candidates regional legislative members, and prospective members of the regional legislature in accordance with the provisions of legislation, the implementation of campaigns and campaign funds, Procuring logistical elections and distributions, conducting voting and counting the results of elections in the polling station, ballot movement, the vote count report, and the vote count certificate, from the polling station level to the sub-district election committee, recapitulation of the results of the vote count, re-counting and voting, continued elections, and general elections Continuation, and determination of election results, (iii) Preventing the occurrence of money politics, (iv) Overseeing the neutrality of the state civil apparatus, neutrality of members of the Indonesian national army, and neutrality of members of the Indonesian republican police, (v) overseeing the implementation of decisions, consisting of: Election Organization Ethics Council verdict, court ruling regarding violations and disputes in general elections, Election Supervisory Body decisions, decisions of the electoral Commission, decisions of competent officials for violations of the neutrality of the state civil apparatus, neutrality of members of the Indonesian national army, and neutrality of members of the Indonesian republican police
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
