Abstract

BackgroundThe magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Knowledge of MSA-related complications, indications for removal, and techniques are puzzled. With this study, we aimed to evaluate indications, techniques for removal, surgical approach, and outcomes with MSA removal.MethodsThis is an observational singe-center study. Patients were followed up regularly with endoscopy, pH monitoring, and assessed for specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and generic short-form 36 (SF-36) quality of life.ResultsFive patients underwent MSA explant. Four patients were males and the median age was 47 years (range 44–55). Heartburn, epigastric/chest pain, and dysphagia were commonly reported. The median implant duration was 46 months (range 31–72). A laparoscopic approach was adopted in all patients. Intraoperative findings included normal anatomy (40%), herniation in the mediastinum (40%), and erosion (20%). The most common anti-reflux procedures were Dor (n = 2), Toupet (n = 2), and anterior partial fundoplication (n = 1). The median operative time was 145 min (range 60–185), and the median hospital length of stay was 4 days (range 3–6). The median postoperative follow-up was 41 months (range 12–51). At the last follow-up, 80% of patients were off PPI; the GERD-HRQL and SF-36 questionnaire were improved with DeMeester score and esophageal acid exposure normalization.ConclusionThe MSA device can be safely explanted through a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. Tailoring a fundoplication, according to preoperative patient symptoms and intraoperative findings, seems feasible and safe with a promising trend toward improved symptoms and quality of life.

Highlights

  • The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA), first introduced in 2007 and approved by FDA in 2012, has gained progressive acceptance as valuable therapeutic alternative for the surgical management of gastroesophageal refluxConcerns about possible complications and erosion of a foreign body placed at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) led to initial criticism because the past experience with the Angelchick and gastric banding devices [8, 9]

  • While the use of the MSA is increasing worldwide [14], studies focusing on device failure, techniques for removal, and outcomes remain essential in this stage of the adoption of the MSA device into surgical practice

  • 32 MSA devices were implanted at our institution and five patients underwent MSA explant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA), first introduced in 2007 and approved by FDA in 2012, has gained progressive acceptance as valuable therapeutic alternative for the surgical management of gastroesophageal refluxConcerns about possible complications and erosion of a foreign body placed at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) led to initial criticism because the past experience with the Angelchick and gastric banding devices [8, 9]. While the use of the MSA is increasing worldwide [14], studies focusing on device failure, techniques for removal, and outcomes remain essential in this stage of the adoption of the MSA device into surgical practice. The purpose of this single-center cohort study was to analyze our experience with MSA removal and describe the surgical technique, intraoperative technical aspects, and medium-term follow-up results. The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Conclusion The MSA device can be safely explanted through a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. Tailoring a fundoplication, according to preoperative patient symptoms and intraoperative findings, seems feasible and safe with a promising trend toward improved symptoms and quality of life

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.