Abstract

In this work, polycrystalline powder samples of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)6]·7.2H2O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)6]·7.1 H2O have been synthesized by a coprecipitation method. The lattice parameter a is 10.053(8) A and 10.083 A for Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)6]·7.2H2O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)6]·7.1H2O, respectively. When the temperature reaches to 5 K, the magnetization is 7.262 emu/g and 0.142 emu/g for Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)6]·7.2H2O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)6]·7.1H2O, respectively. The coercive field and the remanent magnetization of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)6]·7.2H2O are 1204 Oe and 0.382 μB/fu, respectively. The coercive field and the remanent magnetization of Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)6]·7.1H2O are 833 Oe and 0.681 μB/fu, respectively. In the initial magnetization curve, under the external magnetic field of 7 T, the magnetization of Cu0.64Mn0.86[Fe(CN)6]·7.2H2O and Cu0.84Mn0.66[Fe(CN)6]·7.1H2O is 2.13 μB/fu and 2.44 μB/fu, respectively. The difference between the calculated magnetic moment and the theoretical magnetic moment is quite large, which may be due to spin frustration.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.