Abstract

We describe a new NASA website that shows normalized magnetic field (B) magnitude profiles withinWindmagnetic clouds (MCs) (i.e., observationsversusbasic modelversusmodified model) for 209 MCs observed from launch in late 1994 to July of 2015, where model modification is based on the studies of Lepping et al. (Solar Phys, 2017, 292:27) and Lepping et al. (Solar Phys, 2018, 293:162); the basic force free magnetic cloud parameter fitting model employing Bessel functions (Lepping et al., J. Geophys. Res., 1990, 95:11957) is called the LJB model here. The fundamental principles should be applicable to theB-data from any spacecraft at 1 AU. Earlier (in the LJB study), we justified why the field magnitude can be thought of as decoupled from the field direction within an MC, and further, we justified this idea in terms of actual observations seen over a few decades with examples of MCs fromWinddata. The model modification is achieved by adding a correction (“Quad”) value to the LJB model (Bessel function) value in the following manner:B(est)/B0≈ [LJB Model + Quad (CA,u)], whereB0is the LJB-estimated field magnitude value on the MC’s axis,CAis the relative closest approach (SeeSupplementary Appendix A), anduis the distance that the spacecraft travels through the MC from its entrance point. In an average sense, the Quad technique is shown to be successful for 82% of the past modeled MCs, when Quality (Q0) is good or excellent (seeSupplementary Appendix A). The Quad technique is successful for 78% of MCs when all cases are considered. SoQ0of the MC LJB-fit is not a big factor when the success of the Quad scheme is considered. In addition, it is found that the Quad technique does not work better for MC events with higher solar wind speed. Yearly occurrence frequency of all MC events (NYearly) and those MC events with ΔσN/σN2≥ 0.5 (NΔσN/σN2≥0.5) are well correlated, but there is no solar cycle dependence for normalizing NΔσN/σN2≥0.5with NYearly.

Highlights

  • AND BACKGROUNDA magnetic cloud (MC) is a solar wind region with the following features: enhanced magnetic field strength, a smooth change in magnetic field direction as observed by a spacecraft passing through the magnetic clouds (MCs), low proton temperature compared to the ambient proton temperature, and low proton plasma beta (e.g., [1,2,3])

  • We describe a new NASA website that shows normalized magnetic field (B) magnitude profiles within Wind magnetic clouds (MCs) for 209 MCs observed from launch in late 1994 to July of 2015, where model modification is based on the studies of Lepping et al (Solar Phys, 2017, 292:27) and Lepping et al (Solar Phys, 2018, 293:162); the basic force free magnetic cloud parameter fitting model employing Bessel functions

  • A magnetic cloud (MC) is a solar wind region with the following features: enhanced magnetic field strength, a smooth change in magnetic field direction as observed by a spacecraft passing through the MC, low proton temperature compared to the ambient proton temperature, and low proton plasma beta (e.g., [1,2,3])

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A magnetic cloud (MC) is a solar wind region with the following features: enhanced magnetic field strength, a smooth change in magnetic field direction as observed by a spacecraft passing through the MC, low proton temperature compared to the ambient proton temperature, and low proton plasma beta (e.g., [1,2,3]). Only later do we adjust the B (model) profile to the average value of B across the MC; this leads to providing an appropriate B0, which is the estimated value for the magnetic field magnitude on the axis of the MC This treatment for over 200 Wind MCs has generally provided a faithful reproduction of the profile of the direction of B within a MC for most cases (i.e., at least at 1 AU) and especially when considering the lower frequency components of B, that is, excluding what may be considered “noise.” But the model rarely gives a very good reproduction of the actual profile of the magnitude of B. The study by Lepping et al [10] attempts to statistically correct for this shortcoming of the LJB model, as described below

THE QUAD SCHEME FOR MODIFYING THE B-INTENSITY WITHIN THE MAGNETIC CLOUD
WIND WEBSITE TO OBTAIN THE FULL SET OF FIELD INTENSITY PLOTS
EXAMPLE OF A PAGE OF 20 CASES OF
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call