Abstract

Purpose: To determine normal macular thicknesses and their associations with demographic and ocular variables in healthy eyes of black South Africans.Methods: Six hundred healthy subjects (N = 600) underwent height and weight measurements followed by a complete ophthalmic examination, which included auto-refraction, subjective refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ocular biometric measurements and tonometry. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with the Nidek NT530P (Tonopachy™) and the axial length (AL) thickness with the Nidek Echoscan. The central corneal thickness (CCT) and macular thickness were measured using iVue-100 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Optovue, Inc.). The macular thickness map protocol that divides the macular area into nine regions of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) fields was used. Variations in macular thickness measurements with body mass index (BMI), age, gender, refraction, AL, CCT and IOP were determined with partial correlation analysis.Results: The 600 subjects had a mean age of 28.15 ± 13.09 years (range = 10–66 years), with 305 (50.83%) being males and 295 (49.17%) females. The thickness values of the central, inner and outer maculae were normally distributed, with means of 235.89 µm ± 20.04 µm, 303.56 µm ± 18.68 µm and 287.81 µm ± 14.61 µm, respectively. Mean total macular thickness for all subjects was 268.72 ± 15.04 µm. The temporal quadrant was markedly thinner than all other quadrants for both inner and outer macular regions. Macular thicknesses were greater in men than in women (p < 0.05). The thickness of mean central, mean inner and mean outer maculae increased significantly with increasing BMI (p < 0.001). Central, inner and outer maculae were significantly associated (p < 0.001) with a high hyperopic spherical equivalent refraction. AL was associated with a thin inner macula (p < 0.05) and an outer macula (p < 0.001), but not with a thinner central macula (p > 0.05). Age, CCT and IOP were not associated with macular thickness values in any quadrant (p > 0.05).Conclusion: The macular values were thinner in women than in men and were related to BMI, gender, hyperopic spherical refraction and AL with regional variations. These differences should be considered when interpreting optical coherence tomography results for accurately diagnosing and managing retinal abnormalities.

Highlights

  • Measurement of macular thickness is essential for diagnosing and monitoring pathological changes in various ocular diseases such as glaucoma, macular hole and macular oedema.[1]

  • The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of macular thicknesses and to assess any associations with demographic (BMI, age and gender) and ocular variables (SE, axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP)) in normal black South African subjects using iVue SD-optical coherence tomography (OCT)

  • No significant differences were found between the genders for body mass index (BMI), age, spherical equivalent (SE), CCT and IOP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measurement of macular thickness is essential for diagnosing and monitoring pathological changes in various ocular diseases such as glaucoma, macular hole and macular oedema.[1] In addition, knowledge of macular thickness in comparison with population or normal values and their associations with other parameters such as demographic and ocular variables is important for the treatment and follow-up of disease severity or progression.[1]. The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has allowed eye care professionals to quantitatively and qualitatively assess retinal parameters to detect small changes in these parameters and to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment modalities.[2] Previous studies[3,4] have shown that quantitative measurement of retinal parameters using OCT can distinguish between pathology and physiology, emphasising the importance of understanding normal variations in different populations, races and ethnicities using the OCT.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.