Abstract

PURPOSE:To investigate why some children with amblyopia fail to achieve normal visual acuity. METHODS:Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to observe the morphology of the macular tissue of children with various types of amblyopia who failed to achieve normal visual acuity (</= 20/25). Average thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of the foveola and fovea (1-mm diameter range) was then assessed by macular retinal tomography map measurement. The data obtained were compared with those considered normal to detect any abnormality. RESULTS:Fifteen patients (24 eyes) were examined. Images showed abnormality with thickened RNFL in the macular area in which either the fovea was not observed or the wave lines were flattened or unformed. The average RNFL thickness measured 201.5 +/- 17.9 mum for the foveola and 226.9 +/- 11.4 mum for the fovea (1-mm diameter range). The differences were highly statistically significant compared with normal values. Five cases were ametropic amblyopia, 5 were anisometropic amblyopia, and 5 were idiopathic amblyopia. Eleven cases showed improvement and 4 cases showed no response to the treatment. Twelve cases were myopic, 1 was mixed astigmatism, and 2 were normal. Nine cases were binocular amblyopia and 6 cases were uniocular amblyopia. CONCLUSION:Some children with various types of amblyopia who failed to achieve normal visual acuity after treatment showed macular abnormality on OCT examination.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.