Abstract

Marine plastic litter is ubiquitous and knowledge about its impact on coasts, open waters, the deep-sea, and the biota found in those habitats is increasing. However, studies of how it affects terrestrial environments such as islands are not as common. Over time, macroplastics in marine, as well as terrestrial environments, will fragment into microplastics. A toxic level of microplastic is defined by characteristics of the specific organisms and the habitat it affects, but also of the plastic itself. Plastic litter is being collected from wilderness areas through beach-cleanups by volunteers, schools and professionals. A question that needs to be addressed is whether macroplastic that is partially weathered and buried under vegetation should be taken out of the topsoil layer or left untouched to further degrade with the risk of negative impacts on soil organisms or removed from the topsoil layer. A quantification of the amount of plastic found within the topsoil layer is therefore of great interest. In this study, a survey was conducted in spring/autumn 2020 at Mausund and Froan landscape conservation area in Frøya municipality, Norway (N63°). Thirteen samples of vegetated soil from above the storm tide limit from eight remote and uninhabited islands were collected, quantified and analyzed, and the results showed high amounts of plastic. Potential future concentrations of microplastic in the samples if left untouched are estimated, based on a formula from existing literature.

Highlights

  • Microplastic items in nearshore soil and peat are counted, weighed, classified and the ratio between the amount of macroplastics and soil is calculated as percentage of total soil samples

  • The aim of this study is to (I) document how much macroplastic is found in the soil samples (II) document the types of plastic buried in the soil samples, and (III) estimate the quantity and weight of microplastics the macroplastic can be fragmented into if left to further degrade

  • Macroplastics were weighed in grams per 27 l and the ratio between macroplastics and soil was calculated as a percentage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outdoor air (Gasperi, 2018), tap water (WHO, 2019), animals throughout the food web (GESAMP, 2015; Hasnat, 2018) and in the terrestrial environment in general (Chae and An, 2018; Malizia and Monmany-Garzia, 2019; Accinelli et al, 2020). In the context of this study, our research question is whether remote uninhabited islands in Norway show similar concentrations of plastics as hotspots areas. Eight Islands were randomly selected, and 13 soil samples in total were collected Two of those were taken as reference samples, approximately 100 m from the shoreline, as they were expected to contain small concentrations of macroplastic. The aim of this study is to (I) document how much macroplastic is found in the soil samples (II) document the types of plastic buried in the soil samples, and (III) estimate the quantity and weight of microplastics the macroplastic can be fragmented into if left to further degrade. The paper discusses macroplastic in relation to beach cleanup operations and other management implications, where it is today questionable how deep into the vegetation plastic should be removed or left to further degrade

Theoretical background
Sample collection
Sample preparation
Classification
Series3
Results and discussion
Macroplastic analysis with Raman Spectrometer
Visual examination of macroplastic
Findings
Concluding remarks and directions for further research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call