Abstract

Tidal marsh wetlands provide important foraging habitat for a variety of estuarine fishes. Prey organisms include benthic–epibenthic macroinvertebrates, neustonic arthropods, and zooplankton. Little is known about the abundance and distribution of interior marsh macroinvertebrate communities in the San Francisco Estuary (estuary). We describe seasonal, regional, and site variation in the composition and abundance of neuston and benthic–epibenthic macroinvertebrates that inhabit tidal marsh channels, and relate these patterns to environmental conditions. We also describe spatial and temporal variation in diets of marsh-associated inland silverside, yellowfin goby, and western mosquitofish. Fish and invertebrates were sampled quarterly from October 2003 to June 2005 at six marsh sites located in three river systems of the northern estuary: Petaluma River, Napa River, and the west Delta. Benthic/epibenthic macroinvertebrates and neuston responded to environmental variables related to seasonal changes (i.e., temperature, salinity), as well as those related to marsh structure (i.e., vegetation, channel edge). The greatest variation in abundance occurred seasonally for neuston and spatially for benthic–epibenthic organisms, suggesting that each community responds to different environmental drivers. Benthic/epibenthic invertebrate abundance and diversity was lowest in the west Delta, and increased with increasing salinity. Insect abundance increased during the spring and summer, while Collembolan (springtail) abundance increased during the winter. Benthic/epibenthic macroinvertebrates dominated fish diets, supplemented by insects, with zooplankton playing a minor role. Diet compositions of the three fish species overlapped considerably, with strong selection indicated for epibenthic crustaceans—a surprising result given the typical classification of Menidia beryllina as a planktivore, Acanthogobius flavimanus as a benthic predator, and Gambusia affinis as a larvivorous surface-feeder. Fish diets were influenced by position along the estuarine gradient and season. Overall, our data show that local-scale site effects and marsh position within the estuary influence invertebrate community composition and abundance. Additionally, we show that restoring marsh ecosystems can subsidize fishes similarly to reference marshes. We, thus, recommend that managers focus on the ability of restoring marshes to produce food subsidies for target species when planning and designing tidal marsh restoration projects, especially those targeted for food web support.

Highlights

  • Worldwide, tidal marsh degradation has decreased estuarine ecosystem functions such as energy production, fish and wildlife habitats, nutrient cycling and filtration, and integrity of food web systems (Teal 1962; Childers et al 2002; Deegan et al 2002; Kemp et al 2005; Van Dolah et al 2008)

  • Average taxa richness was highest in Pond 2A (17.76 ± 3.04) and lowest at Sherman Lake (8.57 ± 1.28)

  • We found that benthic/epibenthic macroinvertebrates and neuston of tidal channels in both natural and restoring marshes of the northern estuary predominantly reflect variability in environmental variables related to seasonal changes, such as temperature, freshwater flow, and salinity, as well as to those related to marsh structure, such as the vegetation community and channel edge or perimeter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tidal marsh degradation has decreased estuarine ecosystem functions such as energy production, fish and wildlife habitats, nutrient cycling and filtration, and integrity of food web systems (Teal 1962; Childers et al 2002; Deegan et al 2002; Kemp et al 2005; Van Dolah et al 2008). The Bay–Delta system no longer supports such a breadth or abundance of organisms, and the diversity and productivity of the historic food web has declined. An unexpected decline in the abundance of several pelagic nekton species—commonly referred to as the Pelagic Organism Decline (POD)—has been observed, possibly triggered by a combination of food stress, increased pollution, biological invasions, hydrological changes in freshwater inflow, and physical–chemical changes to pelagic fish habitat (Sommer et al 2007). The loss of wetlands and tidal marshes is typically missing from conceptual models that describe potential contributors to the POD (Sommer et al 2007), even though that loss may be an underlying contributor to present-day food limitation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call