Abstract

Sexual selection drives elaboration in animal displays used for competition and courtship, but this process is opposed by morphological constraints on signal design. How do interactions between selection and constraint shape display evolution? One possibility is that sexual selection continues exaggeration under constraint by operating differentially on each signal component in complex, modular displays. This is seldom studied on a phylogenetic scale, but we address the issue herein by studying macroevolutionary patterning of woodpecker drum displays. These territorial displays are produced when an individual rapidly hits its bill on a hard surface, and drums vary across species in the number of beats included (length) and the rate of drumbeat production (speed). We report that species body size limits drum speed, but not drum length. As a result of this biomechanical constraint, there is less standing variation in speed than length. We also uncover a positive relationship between sexual size dimorphism and the unconstrained trait (length), but with no effect on speed. This suggests that when morphology limits the exaggeration of one component, sexual selection instead exaggerates the unconstrained trait. Modular displays therefore provide the basis for selection to find novel routes to phenotypic elaboration after previous ones are closed.

Highlights

  • Complex animal displays diversify in response to a tug-of-war between multiple evolutionary pressures

  • We first aimed to test whether drum speed and length are differentially constrained by morphology

  • We find that species with the fastest drums undergo a robust trade-off between drum speed and body size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Complex animal displays diversify in response to a tug-of-war between multiple evolutionary pressures. Work on a proximate scale shows that sexual selection operates differentially based on the diverse constraints that influence signals [4,5,6], and it is an ongoing challenge to understand how this microevolutionary process informs phenotypic patterning at the macroevolutionary scale. Studies through the latter lens reveal that both constraint and selection profoundly influence display elaboration [7,8,9], the inherently complex nature of signal design suggests that these fundamental processes may work in unexpected ways [1,10].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call